As if W.W.J.D. (what would Jesus do) wasn't bad enough, by which I mean how could we ever imagine that we would come close to knowing what Jesus would do. Now it seems we have W.W.W.B.D. - what would William Booth do.
Recently I have become more distressed and irate as I read blog after blog by these so-called 'Primitive Salvationists'. They seem to be creating an elite class of Salvationism that you can only belong to if you embrace all the Booth ideas, rather than the spirit of what he stood for. 'Aggressive Christianity' - isn't that like some kind of oxymoron? Apparently it's time for the Revolution and it's coming in the form of 19th Century-style Salvationism. The rest of us, I guess, will just have to be content with being left in their wake.
I think it is the elitism, or even the superiority, of many of the people who push this agenda that bothers me the most - 'get on board with us or get out of the way'. Some even suggest that being an adherent is a cop-out, or wishy-washy, at best. It's this kind of talk that really creates divisions.
Stand-up tunics, firing volleys, loving the O&R, dying for the flag, War Colleges, crests better than shields, army barmy, etc., ad nauseum.
W.W.W.B.D? Well, we know what he did, but would he have done it exactly the same today in the 21st Century? Personally, I don't think so, but that's just me, or is it?